That it didn’t coincide with a president starting trade wars with all our closest trading partners for no reason.

Oh, is that all

Are we all just going to ignore the fact the kid pictured is clearly too young to be a boomer?

If we ever do met intelligent alien life, there’s no guarantee such a thing will make any sense to them.

I mean, for one, they may not have eyes to see your drawing among a million other likely faulty assumptions in your scenario.

Tesla aren’t too big to fail.

Unlike GM or Ford, Tesla is tiny. Only their market cap is big, and that’s all based on thoughts and prayers not fundamentals.

Only if y’all can finally unite.

The real winners here are China and Russia.

I still expect the EU to remain too fractious to have any real foreign relations power. Until you speak with one voice you will remain weak on the global stage.

Six years, and it’s still a sign of a bad techie.

First the printer is the last thing you should have or trust.

Second, smart homes are not inherently insecure but idiots can EASILY make them that way. Many of the most talented, security minded, techs I’ve ever worked with are home assistant users.

Maintain local control only, avoid using cloud enabled devices and it’s fine.

Stop pushing ignorant positions like this post.

The power of the president did not start out like this. Congress kept giving their power to the executive for political reasons.

It happened over centuries.

“Not voting for the killers” is REALLY a stretch here.

Honestly if Palestine is your one and only policy, not voting was the right choice.

It was well known from Trump’s first term, and everything the man has ever said, that he would encourage attacks on Palestinians vs the Dems who simply stood by and let it happen.

There’s a big difference between not voting for someone who won’t help and actually voting for someone who hates you and will unapologeticly help your enemy kill you.

This is not my beautiful house, this is not my beautiful wife. HOW DID I GET HERE!!

I’m 46, I wish I could go to bed at 22 again.

So, in a nutshell, the assertion is that gender is entirely nurture and not nature.

Yeah, sorry, that is an extraordinary assertion and I’m going to need extraordinary proof.

Are there people for whom gender and sex don’t neatly match up, or even those for whom it is purely performative, sure.

But they are statistical outliers, and not representative of the majority experience.

People can be different then the statistical norm, and that’s ok, but to assert that this norm is entirely cultural is over the top self serving.

Ok, but, why is microwaved water any different the water warmed in a kettle?

This seems like a pointless thing to get worked up over.