FYI. You know what to do.

Another “I don’t understand how he could do XYZ, he gave assurances” incoming. I too want to be paid nicely to not understand anything.

Edit: fixed wording.

They “believe Trump is bluffing. He’s using this proposal as some sort of the negotiation tactic. This is not going to happen”. Direct quote. That’s it.

I watched it so you don’t have to.

1. They voted Trump and Stein.
2. They still think Trump is bluffing.

In a district that Trump carried +21%.

The irony is they’re only letting some users fight information wars, others get censored.

ACLU is already suing and will continue to do so. Another great one to support which is not on this list is the National Network of Abortion Funds.

Sanders is already cozying up to Trump, I wouldn’t let him or his campaign manager anywhere near the DNC.

He needs to implement all of this first, and it ain’t happening on the first day. People talk about it like it’s already done. Don’t comply in advance.

NYT paying their editors and authors obscene money to understand politics and this is what they come up with. And it is all intentional.

When I had my first job as a receptionist, our fax still printed on thermal paper rolls and we had a particularly bright customer fax us a 50 page contract. I was almost in tears as I watched a newly replaced very expensive roll getting wasted in minutes. I called my supervisor to vent and he walked to my desk with a sharpie, wrote IMCOMPLETE across the roll and said “fax it back to them”. They were calling us back in less than a minute screeching on the phone to stop transmission.