I said that the privacy concerns being worth the cost of a “smart”-free TV means nothing to the majority of people.

You said that this isn’t true, and that their main customer is commercial places.

I suggested, in response to this, that the majority of people don’t own such commercial places.

What part are you not understanding?

Yes because the majority own/buy TV’s commercial places like offices and stadiums.

Which is an entirely fair compromise for people who use Lemmy, but means precisely nothing to the majority.

At only double the price of an equivalently priced smart one! Bargain _/s