

Yeah, thats probably the reasoning.
Decentralise everything!


Yeah, thats probably the reasoning.


On different days, apparently. I dont get it either.


The guy said, “Right now, the war is costing us $25 billion” or something close to that. Is it just me, or is that weird phrasing? Wouldnt you say “The war cost us … so far” rather than use the present tense “costing us”?


“The statement says that “shall preserve its right to take all necessary measures in self-defense, at any time, against planned, imminent, or ongoing attacks.” Israel frequently claims its attacks on Lebanon, Gaza, and elsewhere in the region are a response to some sort of threat, even when it’s clear there was none, and the US has historically tolerated major Israeli ceasefire violations.”


What do you mean?


What a hero
He apparently caused around $200 million in damages.
Russian, сука блять (cyka blyat) (fucking shit, bitch whore). блять just sounds to me like someone mini vomiting or coughing while theyre cursing.
cyka - bitch blyat - fuck


No, its not too powerful. Its too chaotic. You cant control it.
EDIT: It seems I have misunderstood. I thought containment here referred to the harness, but they meant VM type of containment. I am still quite skeptical, but it looks like this model is quite good at finding and utilizing security flaws in software.


God I cannot stand Carlson. He always has this “Im asking tough questions” vibe, pausing every 3 words. But his statements are always simultaneously the most ridiculous uninsightful shit ever.
“Theres a rumor that Trump didnt put his hand on the bible. Is it because that… (pause for 5 secs)… perhaps… (pause for 5 seconds)… sees himself as God?” (Pauses for 10 secs now as if he said something even remotely profound)


Mine too but honestly this is getting tiring.


Also, it could ignite a nuclear arming race and every country will try to get nukes.


How the fuck would that help against missiles?


Get control of it first…


Is is legal to commit war crimes in the United States? Because if it is, this becomes an ethical argument rather than a legal one.
This is a semantic argument. I say that Jesus is not a Christian, because Christians are those who follow Christ.
I think that Jesus is a Jewish reformist.


I didnt find anything, which is kindof surprising. I did come across that Polymarket removed a bet on the fate of the stranded pilots.


Wow. They take their figureheads pretty seriously.
Who is she?