• 4 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 27th, 2023

help-circle






  • If the party leadership doesn’t understand why you need to step down, they aren’t worth supporting. I wouldn’t join or support a org who did that. The first thing you need to do is get safe, you’ll be able to do much more at lower cost to yourself when you are healthy. That party won’t allow you to be healthy, get away from them. That’s a reactionary party.

    Get away from them, get healthy, find a new group.

    You’re clearly good at what you do, why not do it for a group that us capable of caring about you.


  • The capital maximizer that survives is the one that controls legislation to suppress small businesses that might break it’s monopoly. It has found that by putting one group of people under horrifically unbearable conditions, it can worsen the conditions of all others with few complaints so long as they keep the less suppressed workforce convinced that they have it better and may even be superior than the super suppressed (see racism). Destroying the property of others creates demand that it can used to extract more capital from those who have had their property destroyed (see war). Tearing up industrial infrastructure from steel mill to slaughter houses just to prevent small farmers and or any competition from rising in their own backyard and moving manufacturing to places far away allows them to pay people even less (see de-industrialization and the battle for Seattle). Ensuring that there aren’t enough jobs to go around so that those who work have to work so hard they only time to think about work and look down on those who can’t find work. Any waste of resources is a source of capital for the Capital Maximizer. If the Capital Maximizer doesn’t do these things, and the system isn’t changed, it will be bought or destroyed by the Capital Maximizer that does. It can’t even be called the law of the jungle for that is far more fair and just.

    If nothing changes it ends when the population dies out because people no longer have the ability to engage in reproductive labor, due to a lack of resources and sheer energy. At least that’s the current theory, as birthrates in capitalist countries have fallen below the replacement rate. Or when wars get too far out of hand and we all die. Automation and AI just allow the Capital Maximizer to keep going a little longer.

    The system itself is the capital maximizer, to destroy it without perishing requires a complete dismantling of the system with a new system built to rise in it’s place. How we build and support that system will determine if we see what a world without capitalism looks like.


  • Do you know the story of the paperclip maximizer? It’s a cautionary thought experiment written in 2003.

    Quick summary of the thought experiment

    Suppose we have an AI whose only goal is to make as many paper clips as possible. The AI will realize quickly that it would be much better if there were no humans because humans might decide to switch it off. Because if humans do so, there would be fewer paper clips. Also, human bodies contain a lot of atoms that could be made into paper clips. The future that the AI would be trying to gear towards would be one in which there were a lot of paper clips but no humans.

    Oddly enough if you think about it, the story could just as easily refer to capitalism insatiable need for accelerating growth. It is a wealth concentrating ideology. The irresponsible use of AI is killing people but that is to be expected. Every kid AI relieved of life, whether they were driven to it, or living in the wrong place, or starved by job loss, makes the capitalists who sell the AI richer.


  • The Britannica is phrased in a way that makes it impossible or at least extremely difficult to label the creators and enforcers of unjust laws to ever fit it’s definition. A criminal can only be a criminal if they have committed a crime, but it’s legal for a cop to shoot someone on a suspicion of a crime or at least impossible to convict them of that, than they can never be considered criminal.

    There are places in the US where it is illegal to feed homeless people. Feeding the homeless would cause someone to definitionally become a criminal if they are caught and convicted. If one of the people they fed, turned around and say mugged someone, the one feeding the homeless can be called a terrorist. There are also store owners who consider the downward pressure that puts on the price of their wares to be coercive violence. In these twisted minds a cop killing a nurse trying to give aid to someone else, is not a terrorist but the random person feeding the hungry who can’t afford food is.

    Most people hear the word criminal and think that it refers to someone who has broken a just law. However it seems that more and more lately criminal refers to anyone who challenges the status quo or just got too poor. Prisons need their slaves after all.

    The root terror evokes a certain set of emotions, for that reason it’s probably better to just point out that all violence delivered by any government is terrorism.





  • Revolution is coming to the US soon. The question is what kind revolution it will be. History seems to indicate that if we don’t have alternative systems ready when it comes the violent chauvinists will. Those alternative systems are being prepared as I type this. For decades only weeks of progress have been made, but it seems likely that the imperial pedophile cannibals are no longer capable or willing to keep their subversive counter measures in place. They seem to be relying more and more on overt violence. We must have alternative systems for resource distribution, education, health care and physical infrastructure reading. Marches are the first step, networking is extremely important for building new systems.