Maybe with a schema that allows a one time verify, and then churns your entry. If that verify occurs upon entry synchronously at the time you vote, if possible, that’d be no less safe than the paper ballot you feed into the machine.

No different than how it’s recorded today. We can improve from there but it’s not worse with the upside of a public ledger.

This is the exact use-case for a blockchain, a public immutable ledger where you can validate your vote, but nobody can tie it back to you.

Absolutely not

Unclear on the crowdsourced features of there are any, like things in the road, police, etc?

That’s totally untrue. Skin will return to normal temperature from any momentary increase in seconds at most. The cooling effect does other things.

The right of the people would be interpreted to be citizens 100% guaranteed.

Removed by mod

You mean 4 and 6

Except learning in this context is building a probability map reinforcing the exact text of the book. Given the right prompt, no new generative concepts come out, just the verbatim book text trained on.

So it depends on the model I suppose and if the model enforces generative answers and blocks verbatim recitation.

I see a 7/10 in there that seems the most honest.

It requires drill down now and doesn’t list visits on the location itself which is a huge negative.

Doing so should automatically trigger a review, where losing again automatically means you lose your seat and a special election is called.

There isn’t, because you cannot prove a Lemmy user’s gender to enforce this. You can only moderate the content.

Likely with kid gloves

How about blocking this nonsense on Xbox? Need a pi hole yes?

None of that matters, as it’s a book… The problem is her as a person.

Honestly, no

Why no social connections? Best thing to do is to externally connect and have things outside the confines of your current unhappiness.

That does nothing for withdrawn consent or limited consent. This means once you sign, anything goes, and your ability to claim otherwise it’s likely zero.

This is good for the law, but likely enhances retaliatory claims and quells legit claims of withdrawn consent. On the other side it makes positive kit tests with no consent document a slam dunk.