The conversation topic was unintuitive aspects of HA, I’m aware hacky workarounds exist, but I find this (pretty central) behavior quite clunky.

I also find it crazy that you’ve never wanted to dim or brighten more than one light at a time lol but then again, diversity is the spice of FOSS!

Yes thanks, I forgot all of the Spock and Pike stuff was S2, not S1. Also I apparently forgot Section 31 existed!

LOL I knew if I put “VPN” as the first thing someone would reply before reading the whole comment

https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/vpns/proton-vpn-passes-its-fourth-consecutive-no-logs-audit-heres-what-that-means-for-your-data

Use a VPN and also only share the most common, unoriginal thoughts, parrot the opinions of influencers, and never ever reveal anything that might hint at what makes you a unique soul flickering through the universe.

(basically act like a redditor)

This can help https://lemmyverse.net/communities

I know how it works, I’m just saying it’s unintuitive. It’s not how any other smart home system works.

I use adaptive brightness too, actually. But nearly every time I’m manually adjusting a room’s existing brightness, I don’t want every single unpowered devices to turn on, too.

99% of the time I want to adjust the current lighting, I don’t want to first turn on all lights and then adjust all of those lights to a uniform standard before individually toggling them all individually. Powering on all unpowered lights when adjusting brightness should be the edge case, IMO (also again not just my opinion, but the industry standard)

For the record all other smart home systems treat room groups the way I am describing (like a dimmer knob and power switches). But there isn’t even an option in HA for rooms to “only adjust devices currently in use”. The smart home companies seem to have researched how people naturally intuit such things.

I would expect it to behave like all other smart home systems, or like a physical dimmer switch/power switch.

The fact that dimming a room turns ON all the lights in the room is actually wild

I do love that it’s a literal next generation…again

This 100%. YouTube algorithm pushes people towards the most extreme stuff, soif you search for Star Trek you’ll eventually always end up on some ragebait “show”.

I personally think Paramount appeals for nostalgia

Discovery was a big hit, and although it had some nostalgic elements in the first season, it very quickly became it’s own thing and had a unique style.

SNW also seems to be pretty popular and features TOS characters, but even though it’s set in TOS era I wouldn’t say it’s appealing to nostalgia.

SFA is another one that very much it’s own thing and is NOT relying on nostalgia.

Lower Decks and PIC absolutely appeal to nostalgia, but those also seem to be much less popular with general audiences.

Just saying- that if I was a Paramount big wig I think it makes more sense to take the franchise where no star trek show has gone before, rather than backwards. I don’t think you have anything to worry about.

right lol

This one broke zigbee2mqtt for me but I’m not sure why. I rolled back for now.

Sorry what did you mean by “Helium is a fork, so they can keep compatibility going forward”? A fork of what?

It is truly astonishing how a company with their resources could have a program like Teams be so terrible for so long. Matrix/Element have advanced faster than Teams.

Is there a list of sources this pulls from?

Microsoft is using Discord and not Teams?

So it’s not technically Chromium anymore? It’s a fork of Chromium?