The trick is to just get in line and pretend you don’t understand the concept of groups like everyone else does.

Okay, you’re not required to snarkily broadcast that in the conversation, though. You could just ignore it.

Minor nitpick, juries only decide guilt; either guilty or not guilty. There is no way to legally declare someone innocent.

You sir, are entirely divorced from reality. It would be best for you to stop replying to the straw man you made up in your head and reconsider this entire exchange.

I guess the world can be whatever you want when you just make up reality in your head.

Good luck with that.

You may want to freshen up on your history. Ending slavery was a huge debate right at the beginning. They chose poorly in the end, but not for no reason.

Also, there’s a reason the only person you could come up with for your silly comparison was Thomas Jefferson. He was probably one of the most flawed of the founding fathers. Though he’s still a significantly better man than Musk on the whole.

Most of the founding fathers wanted to abolish slavery, but they also knew they needed the economic power of the southern states’ cotton trade and that they would be virulently against ending slavery. They kicked that can down the road, but laid the groundwork that eventually led us there for the most part.

Argued by racists…

So would you say the mugger that knocked you out and took your phone and wallet earned them? It was an effort after all.

Probably just a bunch of people getting in on the short.