- 10 Posts
- 65 Comments
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Anarchism and Social Ecology@slrpnk.net•Tomorrow, France revoltsEnglish
3·3 months ago🫡
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Do you have any sites with calendar of movement-related events in your country?English
3·3 months agoNice to see you on anarchist.nexus Sunshine :)
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Do you have any sites with calendar of movement-related events in your country?English
5·3 months agoI wonder if there’s anything like this in Switzerland/Austria/France
very interesting. got a source?
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Anarchism and Social Ecology@slrpnk.net•No Rules, No Rulers: A Response to the Idea That Anarchy is When We Have Rules But No RulersEnglish
7·3 months agoQuote from somewhere else:
I was reading Peter Kropotkin book and he made an AMAZING point that if anything, power structures and capitalism are utopian! To believe, that the people you place as higher with more Power, would make the right decisions for you when it goes polar opposite to them GAINING more power in a system that only recognizes furthering of power, is I’d say, far more utopian than to believe that people will literally work together to make communities where everyone is happy… like they literally did for MOST of human history before stuff like monarchies were established
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
[Dormant] moved to !tankiejerk@piefed.social@lemmy.world•Ah, finally, a trustworthy source!English
29·3 months agoI made this meme a while ago but it never ceases to be useful:

You double posted in same community I think.
I’m gonna try explain why it feels like to me you’re kind of missing the point.
Like we can think breaking laws in general is good because it makes these useless laws harder to enforce if a lot of people break them. Ie. its a form of resistance against the state.
But also be staunchly against terrible things like random killings and sexual assault.
One doesn’t entail the other.
But that’s not the law illegalism recommends you to break. This is kinda a strawman.
The Anarchist code of conduct, which the comm is based upon does not encourage random murders lol.
This pic from the comm might help explain:

FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Anarchist-friendly states, minarchism, and electorialism.English
4·3 months agoI think this all very much depends on how exactly you define a state.
But I’d push back on the idea anarchist self organisation takes more effort than states. I don’t think it does. Just that the effort used to uphold states has been formalised and territorialised as “jobs” and sometimes just “culture”.
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
[Dormant] moved to !tankiejerk@piefed.social@lemmy.world•Average db0 discussionEnglish
154·3 months agoIt really depends who you’re talking about really.
fxomt and cryptagion are quite far from tankies.
I’ve posted plenty of anti-tankie memes in !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com and got comments of support from dbzer0 himself.
So I think your whole characterisation is lacking a bit of nuance.
Like here’s how dbzer0 reacted to my anti-uyghur genocide denial meme https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/19511364
Anyways. This convo doesn’t seem particularly fruitful. So I’m gonna disengage I think.
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
[Dormant] moved to !tankiejerk@piefed.social@lemmy.world•Average db0 discussionEnglish
135·3 months agoSo lemmy.world is tankie for being federated with ML?
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
[Dormant] moved to !tankiejerk@piefed.social@lemmy.world•Average db0 discussionEnglish
105·3 months agoIt sounds like you didn’t read my whole comment but okay.
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
[Dormant] moved to !tankiejerk@piefed.social@lemmy.world•Average db0 discussionEnglish
164·3 months agoI think it’s better to name names. Calling a whole instance especially one that’s pretty diverse like Dbzer0 tankies is a bit much.
I mean we literally have a tankiejerk there !tankiejerk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
(moved to anarchist.nexus recently which is essentially dbzer0 on piefed)
Like here’s how dbzer0 reacted to my anti-uyghur genocide denial meme https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/19511364
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
[Dormant] moved to !tankiejerk@piefed.social@lemmy.world•Just a little harmless genocide denial and authoritarian simpingEnglish
7·3 months agoGod damn the people who deny well documented ML atrocities and then go on to call themselves anarchist pissed me off as an actual anarchist.
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Voyager@lemmy.world•Broken Inbox for Piefed InstanceEnglish
2·4 months agohappens also on quokk.au
FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.comto
Voyager@lemmy.world•Broken Inbox for Piefed InstanceEnglish
3·4 months agoSame problem on quokk.au
not on piefed.blahaj.zone or anarchist.nexus tho
“laws aren’t real silly”
Dream convo















Ah yes, trust the website of the fascist government currently commiting genocide