What if, hear me out, it was health CARE and not INSURANCE? I’m an American, and we’re so programmed to discuss this as insurance (to stop something bad) rather than health care (a holistic set of benefits). AFAIK, the rest of the world sees this as the normal approach (care).
“Capitalism prices America out of Life & Liberty.”
In the New Testament, there’s plenty of pro immigrant quotes. It’s harder to find the anti-immigrant sentiment (unless you expand to the whole Bible).
These are important to me as gifts from my sister who passed away a few weeks ago. She gave them to me when I was 8 or something, and I’m 36 now. They are supposed to be for good luck & improved studies.
Could be a blooper, prank, or comedy show. Someone also posted AI examples that are close too.
Wild. I guess with enough data.
I would wager comedy show as a good guess based on the other commentor’s observation, but could be AI.
I don’t think so, primarily because of the reversed title on the desk. That would be pretty hard for it to calculate as a detail.
I find myself sitting down without screens more often nowadays because of this phenomenon. Sometimes it’s just too much.
My thought exactly. “Oh shit…DBZ was right…”
Maybe the largest difference for me is how the federated nature changes the social dynamics. For instance, people from Instance X don’t like those from Instance Y, or may even ban them.
This was prevalent on Reddit, buuuut banning can be instance or node based compared to subreddit.
I likely have some opinions or takes I wouldn’t post on lemmy.ml because lemmy.ml has a particular bent. I agree with a lot of it, but I wouldn’t want to offend with what doesn’t align or would get me banned. The ban cascades further out, and how servers interact as wholes with one another in terms of federation is similar.
The social platform mechanics are also different. Upvote has a different impact compared to Reddit (I don’t fully remember the specifics). I think saving has its own relevancy or something?
It’s mostly the same though.
A concern, for sure, but I was interested in the hypothesis behind this increase. The headline sounds like the forest changed at some biological level, but my guess is stuff is decaying & releasing gases or something.
Live your life, homie.
If you want a different take on the concept, check this out.
I don’t want to use AI to generate the sick, tattooed mice in this story, but I bet they’re pretty rad. (Animal testing, less so, jokes aside)
From my experience working with C/D level execs, it makes complete sense:
The version of AI we have right now is heavily catered to these folks. It looks fast & cheap, good enough, and it strokes their ego.
Also, they’re the investor class. All their obscene dragon wealth is tied up in this / the AI bubble, so they are going to keep spurring this on until either:
I think a rational AI agent would agree with me that human suffering should be solved before we give people literal lifetime values of wealth.
If you made $300k PER DAY for 2025 years, you would not have as much money as a 1% oligarch. You need to make $400-500k. Every single day. For over 2000 years.
If you made the average US income, it would take you 10,000 years. People need frames of reference to understand this shit & get mad. It’s immoral, and it shouldn’t exist.
This feels like idle game mechanics or something. What are they doing exactly?
Garbage in, garbage out.