Correct

… they’re not a .ml user

Also it’s just untrue lol? We know markets predate capitalism, I’d be surprised to find anyone disagreeing

He was a right winger 2 years ago, he retreated from social media etc for a long while, so it might not even reflect his current views.

And if it does? Well, then he’d be a right winger and would have done more for class struggle than I ever did, and most likely ever will. Still very much worthy of respect, even as I’d disagree with most of his views.

This sentence made no sense to me as it directly contradicted the previous one. But it’s just a confusion on my part between the function called square root, which confusingly outputs two different numbers called “square roots”, and “the” number called square root; I’ve edited my comment. Thanks for correcting me!

No?

In mathematics, a square root of a number x is a number y such that y² = x; in other words, a number y whose square (the result of multiplying the number by itself, or y ⋅ y) is x. For example, 4 and −4 are square roots of 16 because 4² = ( − 4 )² = 16.

Wikipedia

Edit: I’m wrong lol, there is a difference between the square root function, which accepts two results, and the square root, or principal square root, which is a unique positive number

It’s way simpler to say that tolerance is a contract and you’re not bound by a contract breached by the other party, that description isn’t paradoxical in any way