Right thing wrong reason :/

So… Apply for stuff you qualify for?

taking this opportunity away

A person doesn’t lose out on the first time buyer credits from availability… They get it if they qualify.

Also… they are just going to turn around a rent the place.

Seems like you are just mad at what you imagine about the future.

https://cornhub.website/

That seems optimal, I would be terrified at the thought of a Windows admin touching me.

Same, I have some laying around if they decide to go all weird with the MS authenticator.

Work managed device can sometimes be “install the work app on your personal phone because we are cheap, also enable all the permissions or you can’t use the work app we assigned you to use”

Yeah kinda burying the lede on this. Cars built in the 70s had a much more simple, serviceable construction.

By the time you let it go, it was also probably grandfathered in to emissions requirements because it’s a classic car.

Anything from the 90s- 2010 will not hold up like that one did.

They want AI so the few tasks they can’t automate away have their productivity scored against a fast “intelligence”, so they can browbeat the actual worker down on their wages.

Right, and the people disseminating and hosting the tools tailored to criminal harassment should be held accountable, and the people hosting the resulting images. All of these people have their own revenue that can and should be disrupted.

Push it on to credit card processors, webhost operators, domain registrars etc proceeds of crime.

Edit: they are getting money from somewhere to run the computers these models run on.

6 months?

Evaluation version timer reset every 3 months.

I’m playing this with the boys, very good use of time.

Like, MS isn’t mandating signed exes or trying to fully lock Windows into the MS Store

I’m pretty sure this is changing too. Like the start menu deprioritizing the application menus vs the “app list”

Yeah this happens when the wrong kind of professional reviews exposure, which happens a lot.

Lawyers reviewing the licence terms will absolutely flag stuff that’s realistically a non-issue.

People that do threat risk assessment, (insurance type of thing) can view FOSS and other open standards as a reduction in risk across the board, and when these kind of professionals are tendering the creation of systems they specify open APIs and access to stuff. (At least in the projects that I’ve worked on, security systems in Toronto.)

This isn’t a hard rule, kinda a spectrum.

Glanmercator

Leaning a little too far into protecting people from harassment is rotten?

Indeed I misspelled

Giancarlo has a great joke about it