on the shitpost meter, you score 75%
- 26 Posts
- 108 Comments
on the shitpost meter, you score 50%
Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.mlto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•three business days feels generous
21·11 hours agoon the shitpost meter, you score 45%
Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.mlto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Y'all might not be ready for this
2·11 hours agoon the shitpost meter, you score 55%
Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.mlto
Opensource@programming.dev•I rewrote the ai slop cli utility "tldr" in C, it's 20 times faster.
65·2 days agoC ftw, but seriously, calling an entire language(python) AI slop is going too far, though I will admit python has been responsible for slop code even before LLMs. My opinion on the matter is, efficient use of LLMs will usher a push to go back to hardware level languages like C, as all the benefits of python(except the awesome collection of libraries it has unfortunately accumulated) are kind of moot when you have a machine capable of outputting any boilerplate you ask of it; beyond that I do not trust LLMs to write logic unless its a well known and named algorithm like reversing an array or a linked list.
eh whatever I will humor you; why? why not have have a healthy discussion regarding this, this zero tolerance policy should be reserved for extreme content not thrown around willy nilly
What is fully human written and how are you as a human(I assume) able to distinguish between what is laboriously typed and what is generated, here lets try this exercise and see if you can spot any difference Here is a code I have typed by hand
"smash": push rbp mov rbp, rsp call "smash" pop rbp retand here is machine generated code with the prompt, the slop machine used here is a compiler
GCC take this C code void smash(){smash();} and make it executableand here is the output"smash": push rbp mov rbp, rsp call "smash" nop pop rbp retspoiler
please dont take this seriously
On the shitpost meter, you score 70%
My mind is to ban it to preserve open source.
You will be preserving it alright, but not progressing it in anyway; A blanket ban wont really solve anything, a more sophisticated system would be a pinned comment warning of AI use, which you should eventually rescind if the author proves they have not abandoned the project when their tokens ran out
i went on a crusade ranking shitposts on how much a shitpost it truly was using my proprietary grading methodelogy, a score of 50% indicates the post qualifies as a meme, but does not have any recognisable identifiers of a shitpost
on the shitpost meter, you score 85%
on the shitpost meter, you score 60%
on the shitpost meter, you score 75%
on the shitpost meter, you score 75%
on the shitpost meter, you score 50%
on the shitpost meter, you score 85%
on the shitpost meter, you score 55%
on the shitpost meter you score 20%









on the shitpost meter, you score 75%