Reductive Fallacy

c/cursedcomments

!the sub never took off, i tried!<

Too many claims, too little sources to back it up; did big radish write this?

We can make it care, just got to tell old donny up in the whitehouse that something doesn’t care about his wishes.

Considering current events; way out there

If you have a beefy computer try winboat

Making the argument that you should kill scientists for their inventions is short sighted, dumb and morally dubious

1. Its Science, if Thomas didn’t invent leaded gasoline someone else would have figured it out, an interesting parallel is Fritz Haber, discoverer of the habers process(iykyk).

2. Even if he invented it, it was the corpos who heavily pushed and kept it in circulation for their own benefit.

3. Attacking Science in any way compromises human progress, CFC’s were the stepping stone to less harmful refrigerants.

Plants that humans wouldnt be able to digest efficiently anyway, unlesss you are talking about the more bourgeois meats

Same, the only answers i am getting point to the module just being buggy in general.

I subscribe to the “The US president has investments in our rival country theory”

If you scroll down the article you would see that the select committee is shutting down any requests for change with the same set of arguments. The recourse might be to challenge the act in court but that seems unlikely, The public wont really do anything about it, because in their view it doesn’t affect them; they fail to see(and are veiled from seeing) the highly probable misuse angle of such far reaching legislation.

Bottom line: As long as you don’t touch the street dogs you can get away with anything

Uhh… the insinuation here is: the painting might be depicting rape.

Probably unrelated but OP’s question surfaced this quote in my head

“Saved me?” The Lhazareen woman spat. “Three riders had taken me, not as a man takes a woman but from behind, as a dog takes a b i t c h…

From ‘A Game of thrones’

no way “marty ate more” with the information given.

that is the ‘Expected’ answer

Both fantastic beasts and crushed child do more harm than good to the original franchise

I really liked the first FB movie, it captured the whimsical charm of the intial 3 HP movies and books quite authentically. I could go on and on on how the next film changes the tone, breaks established canon, and generally feels like a cobbled together mess of story beats hastily Scribbled on sticky notes(didn’t anyone proofread the thing?) So for me it ends with newt Scamander helping to apprehend grindelwald and the rest of the story is implied in the main HP books.

Cursed child doesn’t exist, what are you talking about?

Like soft clay, you can turn into someone, but as soon as someone else shakes your hand, it easily deforms

your destination is always between stations

you can never hold a solid shape

you notice peculiar signs that foretell great calamities but you can never make sense of it

classic first worlder with their elevated standard of living:

• Animal based protein is often cheaper and more easily accessible
• herbivores as a middle step helps digest frankly indigestible plants

I am not disagreeing with you there is a fine line between acceptable and gluttonous, but acting holier than though, just cause you insistently chew grass and destroy your gut biome doesn’t help the animals