Very interesting that they’d try to start this before the new Dems even take office. Rats and sinking ships indeed.
Or is this a roundabout way to protect Kegsbreath, by first starting an intentionally flawed impeachment proceeding in order to poison any later attempt?
And I have a hard time believing that there isn’t some solid or liquid (or maybe some other exotic state of matter, due to the heat and pressure) inner core way down in there, even if it’s relatively tiny compared to the size of the planet.
Even if it was entirely made of gas when it formed, surely some materials would have fallen in over the eons that could stay solid/liquid at the pressure/temperature of a gas giant’s core?
Ah, but what if you brought a large balloon, inflated it, and flew a helicopter inside the balloon?
Sure. 25% --> 37% … as long as you (for some arbitrary reason) only consider 8 “places” in the solar system.
7 of those are planets, but Titan is a moon. If we’re going to include moons, then there’s going to be a whole lot more than 8 “places” in the solar system, so the percentage of places where helicopters can work is going to be greatly reduced. If we get really pedantic and consider any orbiting body in the solar system to be a “place”, then there will be hundreds, thousands of them where helicopters can’t possibly work, once you start tallying up asteroids and comets.
Also, why does the list include 7 planets, not 8? What? Are you not interested in trying to make a helicopter work on Mercury? That’s quitter talk!
That’s just because ZFS’s disc cache shows up as application-used memory, instead of disc cache memory. (Disc cache memory is often reported in system monitor tools as ‘free’ memory, because it can be freed up as soon as you need it. ZFS’s disc cache works the same way, but it’s not reported separately to the OS, so that makes it look like ZFS is using a shitload of RAM.) If it bothers you, you can set a maximum amount of RAM for ZFS to use, and that will clear it up. It will mean that your performance is slightly worse, though, because ZFS won’t be able to use disc caching optimally.
And even if the CIA was involved, that doesn’t automatically justify a violent response.
Even if the CIA was involved with the protest, that doesn’t justify the massacre of peaceful, unarmed protesters.
“You see, comrade? As long as we call it ‘Nazi uprising’, we can crush anyone with tank and say is good thing.”
I’ve caught temp bans for way less…
They’re only starting now?
I generally don’t approve of necrophilia, but on the other hand, I am kind of curious what it would feel like to fuck a neck-hole…
True humor transcends language barriers. If you have difficulty being funny in a different language, it means you’re relying too heavily upon puns.
I just hate always being rushed rushed rushed. Always have to go faster. Click faster, move faster, make decisions faster. Faster faster faster.
I want to play a strategy game, but at competitive levels, it’s less about strategic thinking and more about just memorizing what the ‘meta’ is, and then being able to execute that meta faster than the other guy. And all this rush and hurry all the time is just too much strain. I want to play games to relax, not to add stress. I get plenty of stress from real life.
On one hand, maybe we as a society should move past child abuse being played for laughs.
On the other hand, a ham-fisted government ban is probably not the right way to accomplish that.
Obviously. That’s why they’re called parental controls.
If she asks, tell her Fox News went out of business. Very sad.
No, grandma. I’m not going to be an enabler for your Fox News addiction.
“You don’t need a gun, the government will protect you” sounds pretty damn shitty when you look at the current government.
They’ll do that regardless.
But, fun fact, it doesn’t matter if the new batch of congresscritters is sworn in or not – the ones who were voted out stop being congressmen on January 3rd, whether they have a replacement sworn in or not. No matter if their replacements get sworn in or not, they have to go. (Although I’m unclear on the subject of successful incumbents. They certainly don’t have to leave, since they won reelection … but do they need to be sworn in again after every election, or do they just keep going on like before?)
But if they try to play too many games with the ‘swearing in’ nonesense, the incoming congressmen can play hardball right back. There’s no constitutional requirement for being sworn in, not even a rule of Senate/House procedure. It’s just traditional that new congressmen get sworn in before participating. But if they’re playing games with not letting the new ones get sworn in, they could also just show up and start participating/voting anyway. The current batch of Republicans have violated plenty of norms and traditions already, and if they try to use this norm/tradition as a stumbling block, then let’s violate this one too.