- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ca
- foss@beehaw.org
- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ca
- foss@beehaw.org
“A republic, if you can keep it.”
If it’s so great for Privacy, why does it support DNS over HTTPS?
Taking name resolution control away from the user and the OS is NOT a benefit to your privacy. Especially since bad actors can and do exploit DNS for data exfiltration.
(And yes, you can disable it… FOR NOW.)
deleted by creator
Given its in-court defense of Google, Mozilla is clearly complicit and its products should be boycotted. It’s a shame it’s the only alternative to Chromium, but I’m perfectly fine with the US government cracking down on Google, no matter the consequences for Firefox. The monopoly must be disrupted for the benefit of every internet user.
What did mozilla do? waterfox and librewolf still safe?
they changed their ToS to allow themselves to collect some anonymous user data, no idea if they’ve started
the waterfox and librewolf are still safe
and also ironfox
(we have the three elements; iron, water and fire. where is wind?)