LambdaRX@sh.itjust.works to Privacy@lemmy.ml · edit-23 days agoWhat is the lowest score you have achieved on EFF Cover Your Tracks?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1165arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1164arrow-down1imageWhat is the lowest score you have achieved on EFF Cover Your Tracks?sh.itjust.worksLambdaRX@sh.itjust.works to Privacy@lemmy.ml · edit-23 days agomessage-square69fedilinkfile-text
On Librewolf i got 16.48 bits of information, on TOR browser 10.32 bits, but on Tails I managed to get only 9.3 bits. https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
minus-squarewhyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoIf I tried twice and I got a unique id both times, does it mean Firefox is covering my track ?
minus-squareastropenguin5@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoIdk, but I have the same. Scrolling through the tracking methods the only ones with high uniqueness were hash of canvas fingerprint and hash of webGL for me. According to it I still have strong protection Firefox + ublock on mobile though
minus-squarekusivittula@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoif it ran the test again, I’d say yes. but if it just reloads the result page, doesn’t mean anything
minus-squarewhyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoyeah I was wondering if the tool would show that hit saws this id once already
If I tried twice and I got a unique id both times, does it mean Firefox is covering my track ?
Idk, but I have the same. Scrolling through the tracking methods the only ones with high uniqueness were hash of canvas fingerprint and hash of webGL for me. According to it I still have strong protection Firefox + ublock on mobile though
if it ran the test again, I’d say yes. but if it just reloads the result page, doesn’t mean anything
yeah I was wondering if the tool would show that hit saws this id once already