• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think violently hurting people is a good idea.

        A lot of people forget, due to the exceptionally stable nature of modern Western society, that society is built on violence. We, as citizens of a polity, subcontract out our violence to a central state. And this is, to at least some degree, a good thing - there’s a central entity which can be observed and judged and regulated, rather than a million people all trying to enforce and judge one another’s usage of violence as justified or unjustified.

        But ultimately, such subcontracting of violence is conditional - as long as the central state represents our rights adequately, to at least some degree, people are willing to continue to surrender their own sovereign right to commit violence to it. Whenever the central state does not represent a citizen’s rights adequately, the citizen often withdraws that surrender of sovereignty - either in total or, more often, conditionally - to protect their own rights.

        When you make a contract - even in something as small as buying an apple - you are relying on the threat of force from the state to back it - “We will forcibly remove property or freedom from you if you violate this contract.” Violence is a part of everyday life - what’s important is to act in such a way that minimizes the need for it. In the case of defense of LGBT rights, sometimes that means using violence as a means of deterrence against the violence of bigots that is insufficiently deterred by state action.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Punching Nazis is always self defence, since being a Nazi in public is an act of violence.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          in fact, not punching a nazi when you have the opportunity is in itself a net negative, so we can say it’s immoral to not punch a nazi whenever possible.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Fascist lives don’t matter.

        How do you think Pride managed to become a reality? With “thank you” cards?

      • Salamand@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Crazy responses huh? If it makes you feel better, after they chase off any voices of reason, these type of people resort to eating eachother.

          • Salamand@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s a good question.

            One problem with “fascists should be met w violence” is in the lack of definition for fascist. I can tell you, in my experience, saying something like “I don’t want universal healthcare” is enough to earn me the label of “fascist” in leftwing forums like Lemmy and Reddit.

            If the logic is “people who disagree are fascists, and fascists deserve violence” or more simply “people who disagree deserve violence”… well isn’t that what fascists say??

            Do you agree that that example at least highlights a serious problem in the chain of logic?

            • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              No, that’s you and others being petty, that’s not fascism. If you want other people to be dead on the basis of who they were born as and attempt to make those ideals a reality you are a fascist and death for you would be a net positive. Don’t be a crybaby, be realistic and stop being such a reactionary child.

              Edit: And that is not reason, that is just myopic self justification. If you have the problem that people are constantly calling you a fascist and you’re not arguing for death camps and absolute authoritarianism, then the thing that’s going on is that you’re just an insufferable and controlling asshole.

              Edit: Also, point blank, supporting fascists makes you a fascist.

        • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          What would be the issue with that.

          What justified this instance of your violence vs one instance of their violence?

              • macmacfire@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                “Even” Animals don’t deserve it? Why is “even” in that sentence? Are you assuming we would be more willing to hurt animals than we would be to defend ourselves from fascists?

                Tolerance of intolerance is the death of tolerance.

      • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I understand this statement in principle but unfortunately thats not how the world works. If you tolerate intolerance you will just end up opressed or dead. Fascists don’t have any problems hurting and killing whoever they deem not worthy of living, they should be met with the same prejudice.

            • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              You have two opposing groups, let’s call them a and B. Group a says “we dont think group b has a right to exist and we are prepared to get violent” and group b says “we will never use violence”. How long do you expect group b to last?

              Fascists are mercifully not common where I live, but if I hear one mouthing off they’re going to get a savage beating.

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Surely the answer is both sides decided the other doesnt have a right to exist. There’s no difference between labeling someone a Nazi or labeling someone trans when the only point is to excuse violence on that group.

                People are letting their emotions cloud their better judgment, or they haven’t developed better judgment yet. Unfortunately people think very short term and often mold reasoning around their actions after the fact.

                • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  A trans person is a trans person does not have a choice about their identity. Being a nazi is a choice you make because you want to hate people. A nazi merely needs to decide not to be a cunt and the problem resolves itself. The only way a trans person can make peace with a nazi is by hiding who they are and living a lie. It’s not the same. And if you think it is then either A: you’re delusional or B: you know I’m right but you’re also a nazi.

                  To put it a different way, should black people go around in white face to make the kkk happy?

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Man i loved the middle.

      It was extremely relatable

      It reminded me a bit of surviving Jack, fortunately this one did lock more than one season

  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    A lot of the gay elders i know are tired of history being changed when they were actually there. Unfortunately the biggest myth is that [Marsha P. Johnson] started the stonewall riot and kicked off the lgbt movement.

    But in fact she wasn’t even there when it started. She also referred to herself as a drag queen/transvestite… not trangender. Sylvia Rivera is the one who is trans not mpj.

    If anything it was likely a big butch lesbian who started it.


    There wasnt even a brick that started the riots. A lot was happening at once, but it most like started when cops began harassing Butch Lesbian Stormè DeLarverie and someone, no one is sure who, stepped in to her defense. Violence broke out and next thing we know, we have the stonewall riots. Maybe bricks were thrown with Molotovs, but no one can be credited with doing anything first except maybe DeLarverie asking for help.