In short:

A pilot program in Beijing is issuing identification cards for AI digital humans.

The ID states a name, birthday, address and facial features, and allows the digital human to own a digital currency wallet.

What’s next?

Digital humans are widely used in Chinese media with the market estimated to be worth $10 billion in 2025.

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ok, I am also anti-ai but if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck…it’s a duck. At this point, this is software operated actor, so regulation is good.

      • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Ok, I’m an AI vegan[a], but how are

        name, birthday, address and facial features

        “walking, quacking, and looking like a duck”?


        [a]:

        recognizing LLMs as potentially possessing interiority/moral patienthood and opposing their industrial or otherwise objectified use because of it (alongside all the other reasons).

        • Demdaru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Oh, may be I was unclear af. What I meant is if it acts like an actor, talks like an actor and looks like an actor, it’s an actor. And as such, needs to be treated like an actor - have an ID etc.

            • Demdaru@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              What differientiates a good actor from a bad one? Bad one is a puppet, good one can save a bad character by improv.

              And I never said that AI is a good actor - just that it is an actor xD

  • Jayjader@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    The ID states […] a birthday

    Will these companies need to wait 18 years before their “digital humans” can access porn or gambling sites? This just seems to me to be among the worst possible ways to approach this. Why retro fit human-centric ID onto something that isn’t even clearly delimited (is it still the same entity if they are run on a different server? Can the entity be cloned? Who gets arrested if the entity causes damage?)?