You should probably look into some Marxist class analysis if you want to contribute seriously to a discussion like this in left wing circles.
the Petite bourgeoisie are not workers as they own their own means of production (shopkeepers, sole tradesmen) and combine it with their labour to produce value. This is in direct contrast to workers who don’t and only make a living by selling their labour to capitalists who do own the means of production.
The PMC is more contentious, but the managerial aspect puts them in a position of discipling labour which puts their class interests in opposition to workers, at least to some extent.
the Petite bourgeoisie are not workers as they own their own means of production (shopkeepers, sole tradesmen) and combine it **with their labour **to produce value.
Still workers imo; not exploited but still very much working to survive.
Your small business owners are something inbetween delusional capitalists (they don’t really belong to that class but they really want to), and delusional workers (they really do belong to this class because they are still putting in time and effort but they really don’t want to.)
Yes, that’s the point. They share some aspects of their class position with labour, and some with capital. They are in between the two: a middle class.
A manager shares the interest of getting the most out of the people reporting to her and wants to press them to work as hard as possible, because that’s how she gets her promotion, so she shares that interest with capital. But also she is working for a wage not making profits on ownership so she shares that with labour.
A sole tradesman doesn’t have a boss telling him what to do, he only has to care about making a profit and so worries about costs of inputs etc. just like a capitalist. But he has to do his own work he doesn’t command others to do the work for him and just collect the excess value from their work, so in that he is like a worker.
Those are just delusional workers.
You should probably look into some Marxist class analysis if you want to contribute seriously to a discussion like this in left wing circles.
the Petite bourgeoisie are not workers as they own their own means of production (shopkeepers, sole tradesmen) and combine it with their labour to produce value. This is in direct contrast to workers who don’t and only make a living by selling their labour to capitalists who do own the means of production.
The PMC is more contentious, but the managerial aspect puts them in a position of discipling labour which puts their class interests in opposition to workers, at least to some extent.
Still workers imo; not exploited but still very much working to survive.
Your small business owners are something inbetween delusional capitalists (they don’t really belong to that class but they really want to), and delusional workers (they really do belong to this class because they are still putting in time and effort but they really don’t want to.)
Yes, that’s the point. They share some aspects of their class position with labour, and some with capital. They are in between the two: a middle class.
A manager shares the interest of getting the most out of the people reporting to her and wants to press them to work as hard as possible, because that’s how she gets her promotion, so she shares that interest with capital. But also she is working for a wage not making profits on ownership so she shares that with labour.
A sole tradesman doesn’t have a boss telling him what to do, he only has to care about making a profit and so worries about costs of inputs etc. just like a capitalist. But he has to do his own work he doesn’t command others to do the work for him and just collect the excess value from their work, so in that he is like a worker.