• burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Then we need to apply this to some LATAM Marxists too, specially Trots (but some MLs too, unfortunately).

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      LATAM marxists? I havn’t heard of this classification before.

      I would have classified trots as western marxists. I didn’t know they had a LATAM following.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Trotsky lived in LATAM during exile. As such, Trots exist in LATAM more frequently than in other global south regions.

      • burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        LATAM Marxists aren’t a classification, what I mean is Marxist orgs that exist in LATAM. Regarding the specific lines, we have MLs, trots, maoists, hoxhaists, postmodern marxists, liberation theologians, and others.

        A curiosity about some LATAM currents, the Posadist tendency is originally from a Trot org based on Argentina.

        But LATAM has been an intense battlefield of Marxists orgs/tendencies vs reactionary forces and we had guerrillas and civil wars basically everywhere in the 20th century. The PC do B from Brazil took part in the “Guerrilha do Araguaia”, MR8 and other armed resistance movements. Dilma Rousseff, ex president, was also a guerrilla fighter. Gustavo Petro, recent president of Colombia, also participated in the M-19 guerrilla. Argentina had the Montoneros and Uruguay the Tupamaros. However, not all guerrillas were Marxist, and there were many other liberal tendencies in those as well.

        Edit: but the problem is that, after the fall of the USSR, many parties split, many parties and leaders became revisionist, and the remaining ML/Trot parties became insignificant, dogmatic or sectarian.