• leanleft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    in openAI’s case, 70% of their cost is related to researching, training, and aquiring hardware to train new SOTA models.
    hypothetically, they could just put a pause on that anytime and their profit would skyrocket.
    i know they wouldnt do that.
    more likely just lower their prices a bit to remain competitive.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The whole justification for charging their sky high prices is that their model is genuinely more capable than others. If they put a pause on R&D, then DeepSeek will outpace them in a few months charging a fraction of what they do.

      The real problem with the American AI business model is that LLMs are a generic commodity. It’s very hard for any one vendor to differentiate themselves from others. And in such scenarios, the profit trends to zero. There’s a race to the bottom where people keep lowering their margins because everyone else is.

      So, this is why American labs want to create a cartel and control prices. They can’t afford the margins to drop to the cost of inference because they’re on a hook for insane amounts of money. So, they need the profit rate to stay high to justify themselves as a business.

      Meanwhile, Chinese companies don’t have the same problem because they didn’t spend like mad on this tech. And price of electricity in China is also around a third of what it is in the US.

      These charts are very illustrative incidentally:

      https://hai.stanford.edu/news/inside-the-ai-index-12-takeaways-from-the-2026-report