• Jeanne-Paul Marat@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m not pro-zohran by any metric really [social democrat, auto dismissed], but I dont really get the criticism of him not arresting netanahyu.

    1.Hes a mayor. He can’t unilaterally recognize the ICC. And he can’t really arrest a foreign head of state, and even then what would the charge be? The only thing would maybe be delivering him to an embassy that recognizes the ICC? Then what? Idk

    2.if we push past this and say “oh well ge could just do it anyway,” he’d probably be arrested and deposed immediately, and that might be best case scenario. Worst case scenario people start shooting each other when there’s no way he or the progressive forces in America would win.

    Don’t get me wrong, this isn’t a defense of anything else. But I just don’t get this one bit.

    • ☭CommieWolf☆@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      We can absolutely criticize him because of three facts:

      1. He explicitly promised to arrest Netanyahu on his campaign trail.

      2. He affirmed that he would indeed arrest Hamas members in accordance with ICC warrants if they were in New York.

      3. New York City currently holds the legitimate President of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, in captivity. There is already precedent in the US for illegally arresting world leaders, it wouldn’t even be a first.

      All that aside the real problem is that he lied about something he is either unable, or even uninterested to do, purely to signal to the growing anti Zionist sentiment in the US and use it as an easy way to score votes. I think it’s frankly disrespectful and a little gross to use a genocide as a means to get positive press and not follow through on your promises once you get what you want.

      • Makan@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yeah

        But tbh?

        If Mamdani did any of that

        He’d be toast and probably deported to Uganda.

        • ☭CommieWolf☆@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Then he shouldn’t lie that he would do it just to convince people to vote for a Democrat. It’s a failing of both him and electoralism in general.

          • Makan@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Yeah, that’s just America political culture

            If they wanted us to vote

            They wouldn’t currently be taking the right away from folks

            • Makan@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Honestly, I think they’re now taking that right away because of people like Mamdani winning against establishment politicians.

              Yes, Mamdani will get worse as time goes on, I know that, but they don’t want people in high places like that, especially as this global conflict develops further.

      • Makan@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Doesn’t matter to me

        Obama promised a lot of shit and did none of it

        He did worse, even

        Mamdani promised to protect anti-Zionist speech

        He did in the very beginning of his administration (in a very Zionist city, mind you, or at least with a strong Zionist connection and influence)

        Cuomo had to go (I can’t imagine the Cuomo brothers having more influence and the Democrats acting like nothing is wrong with that picture)

        And he effectively got rid of him

        Mamdani has so far disappointed…

        …But frankly, I expect that of most politicians.

        I would rather have someone that pisses off both the libs and the conservatives than another AOC (where everyone is literally just “fake-mad” about AOC).

        Edit: had to actually edit and change a name there because I was distracted when I typed this and saw the error later

        • ☭CommieWolf☆@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          If anything what you got is pretty much another AOC in Madani. It’s the same every time with these “progressive” US politicians. Also I don’t think Obama is a great comparison, he didn’t position himself as a radical socialist. The purpose of characters like Madani, AOC, Bernie etc. is to take all radical energy in the country and steer it back into the established capitalist political system.

          • Makan@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Cori Bush was much better than Mamdani, I’m sorry, dawg

            Every one of “the Squad” is not there any more.

            AOC is because she was and is rich and well-funded.

            Even her backstory is made up and exaggerated.

            She is there.

            The other “Squad” members aren’t.

            I would rather have a fluke like Mamdani than a psy-op like AOC.

            (anyway, whatever, Mamdani will disappoint, I already know this lol but I will take NYC traffic today than what is before lol)

    • La Dame d'Azur@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      This isn’t much different from when libs were crying about South Africa not arresting Putin.

      Arresting a sitting head of state sets a dangerous precedent that no country wants to set. It’s part of why the ICC is a joke in the first place; nobody’s going to enforce these rules except the people who have the power to escape the consequences, like the U.S. for example. It’s unrealistic to expect anybody to follow through on these “arrest X leader” threat. There’s no incentive to do so and every incentive not to.

    • star (she)@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      the criticism ive seen more is: he should do policies that he can actually do (eg. ban zionist funding / investment), instead of posturing about policies he cannot do

    • Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago
      1. The NYPD have been deputized by federal law enforcement in an anti terrorism task force. They 100% have jurisdiction. As the mayor he appoints the commissioner and he could choose a commissioner who would get it done.

      2. In the process of deposing a mayor and installing a new mayor who would then install a new police commissioner there would be plenty of time for Mileikowsky to be transferred to the Hague.

      We shouldn’t be hating on mamdani for being a liar, fraud and spinless wretch. He is a liar and a fraud and a spinless wretch but that is because he is a democrat. This is not a reason to hate him, this is a reason to hate the democratic party and anyone who would run under their banner.

    • Makan@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Frankly, I am pro-Zohran

      If liberals and Zionists keep wringing their hands about him or whatever

      Then fuck it, I am not reformist, I still want revolution, but fuck, I will defend at least some of the good he does, idk…

      • Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        But has he really done anything good or has he just said a lot of shit and maybe made a few bandaid solutions to systemic problems?