SagXD@ani.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 days agoRuleani.socialimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up1630arrow-down159
arrow-up1571arrow-down1imageRuleani.socialSagXD@ani.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-squareZeffSyde@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·5 days ago‘No harm’ How much CO2 was generated in the creations of these shit posts? Could that energy been used in some way that generated something more than chuckles?
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down3·edit-25 days agoLess CO2 than playing a videogame. I can generate an AI image with my graphics card at 100% in 5 seconds, probably less. I gaming afternoon can be 5 hours with the same graphics cars at 100%. I suppose you are also worry by the increase of CO2 usage in 3d art, or in digital art instead of pen and paper art. Are you not? For me it takes less processing power to generate an AI still than to render a frame in blender with a lot of lighting, shaders and whatnot involved.
‘No harm’
How much CO2 was generated in the creations of these shit posts?
Could that energy been used in some way that generated something more than chuckles?
Less CO2 than playing a videogame.
I can generate an AI image with my graphics card at 100% in 5 seconds, probably less.
I gaming afternoon can be 5 hours with the same graphics cars at 100%.
I suppose you are also worry by the increase of CO2 usage in 3d art, or in digital art instead of pen and paper art. Are you not?
For me it takes less processing power to generate an AI still than to render a frame in blender with a lot of lighting, shaders and whatnot involved.