here are some hyper-polluting individuals:

  • the Rolling Stones’ Boeing 767 (5,046 tonnes of CO2)
  • Lawrence Stroll (1,512 flights)
  • Thirty-nine jets linked to 30 Russian oligarchs – (30,701 tonnes of CO2)

relevant quote:

But I will say this, a movement can’t get along without a devil, and across the whole political spectrum there is a misogynistic tendency to choose a female devil, whether it’s Anita Bryant, Hillary Clinton, Marie Antoinette, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, or J.K. Rowling [or Taylor Swift]. And there’s always gonna be people who seize on any opportunity to be misogynistic. So I would advise trans people and our allies [or environmentalists] to keep in mind, that J.K. Rowling [Taylor Swift] is not the final boss of transphobia [anti-environmentalism]. She’s not our devil. The devil is the Republican Party, the Conservative Party.

Natalie Wynn (emphasis and bracket text mine)

edit: if you can’t respond to this without using the c*nt expletive it is not helping your case lmao. mods are we okay with this? in any case, please don’t feed the trolls.

edit 2/FAQ: “but why did she threaten legal action against that college kid though?” still shitty, but refer to this comment for a good explanation of the context behind that decision.

She only threatened legal action since those memes started before when her flight movements got the attention of the right in an attempt to make her less credible of a voice speaking out against trump. And knowing how batshit insane trump cultists can be and how she’s basically the single most hated person of his base I’m not surprised that she feared for her security. Those records were public for years but the legal action only happened after someone created that meme and even fox news suddenly cared about plane emissions…

and another good comment

[…] For Swift, this is legitimate fear. I don’t know if you’ve ever experienced actual fear for your life, but it’s crippling, and it effects your psyche. To experience that on a daily basis because of an app? You bet your goddamn ass I’m going to talk to my lawyers about what my options are.

sources/timeline for the above:

    • kattenluik@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ah yes, a text post with informative links… This must be Reddit!

      What could possibly even be your problem with this post?

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Insane to defend a multimillionaire just because shes a woman. Especially when she isnt even the first person the internet criticized for airplane waste.

        Youre the person being mocked by eric andres “girl power” bit

        • kattenluik@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I don’t see any defending especially just because she’s a woman, I see a post trying to point out that there’s bigger better targets than the current popular one.

          Choosing the most popular person there is right now seems counterintuitive to me either way.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Shes a target because she sent legal threats to a person posting public flight details about private flights.

            For the same reason musk was a target, after he did the exact same thing for the exact same reason.

            • kattenluik@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I mean that’s stupid, but I don’t feel like that’d be the only reason nor does it actually matter in the full context of this post.