noerdman@discuss.tchncs.de to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 days agoPoints in Timediscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square70linkfedilinkarrow-up1499arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up1489arrow-down1imagePoints in Timediscuss.tchncs.denoerdman@discuss.tchncs.de to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square70linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 days agoI mean, they obfuscated it by adding seconds. It’s really not that hard. Just takes a few seconds instead of a glance.
minus-squarenoerdman@discuss.tchncs.deOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoIf that obfuscated something, it wasn’t on purpose… it’s just literally the clock in my dad’s kitchen.
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 days agoIt’s to make a nerdy thing more nerdy. But they really shouldn’t have added seconds to a thing that takes more than a second to read.
minus-squarenoerdman@discuss.tchncs.deOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 days agoimho, the “seconds” bits are neat because you can see things change… Like, you see that it does stuff. Like the “seconds” hand on an analogue clock, it’s mostly practical to see that it’s working as expected.
I mean, they obfuscated it by adding seconds. It’s really not that hard. Just takes a few seconds instead of a glance.
If that obfuscated something, it wasn’t on purpose… it’s just literally the clock in my dad’s kitchen.
It’s to make a nerdy thing more nerdy. But they really shouldn’t have added seconds to a thing that takes more than a second to read.
imho, the “seconds” bits are neat because you can see things change… Like, you see that it does stuff. Like the “seconds” hand on an analogue clock, it’s mostly practical to see that it’s working as expected.