Nina spitting truths as always. She’s on fire recently, so follow her if you’re not doing so already.

To be clear; everyone working in my government, particularly after today, is a Nazi, or someone who works for Nazis. Do you know what we call people who worked for the Nazis, in the Nazi government? Yes, that is correct, Nazis.

So Machado is certainly not gonna feel lonely on the list of people on my TV who are definitely Nazis.

Oh, was that too harsh? Are you feeling bad for the good career civil servants, working for the literal fucking Nazis, who I have just impuned? Cool, let’s refer back to that part where I said I was surrounded by people who openly recognize that this is fascism, and ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY refuse to accept what that actually means.

We call people, who worked for the Nazi Party, in the Nazi government, Nazis. Nobody says “the Nazi government and the career civil servants who hated them but stayed.”

“They’ll just find someone else.”

Then let them. “I took the job at the concentration camp because I was sure Hitler would find someone else” was not a good defense in court last time, and it won’t be this time either.

  • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I demanded a precise request about how do you determined Truth Social is an “official US government communication.” If you say that is the case, you must provide legal contracts and receipts.

    Now Röhm, answer the question: is he a President or a Dictator?

    • sureshot0@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      You are within your rights to randomly kick someone in the balls, metaphorically, so it’s ok that you’re being mean for no reason, but don’t over use this privilege. I think we’re all feeling this.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      how do you determined Truth Social is an “official US government communication.”

      Well no, I glossed over that because I didn’t want to explain at length how it’s a dumb thing for you to ask me about. I can’t provide a rigid definition, because there is no singular rigid definition of an “official government communication” - that’s a description of what it is, not a strict categorization of “type of communication”.

      It’s an official government communication, in that an official for the government (trump acting in his official capacity as president) was using it to communicate information about a government policy. That’s… as far as it goes, buddy.

      Explain again how this makes me a Nazi?

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Since you want to redefine how the US sanctions government equipment to your interpretation on how a private Dictator uses his Mastodon instance.

          This has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion, that’s about the utilization of government resources for private use, not private resources for government use.

          Also again, my downvote record isn’t… approving trump’s plans, or fascist praxis, or… whatever you’re rambling about. This wild shifting in attempts to justify your accusations is getting a little unhinged, how does any of this make me a nazi?

          • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            A private dictator uses a private instance.

            The US government doesn’t own, or operate a Mastodon instance.

            There wasn’t anything official about the abduction AFTER the Whitehouse declaration.

            Claiming a private dictator’s words on his private communication is “official US government communications” is preposterous.
            No need to reiterate dictators can lie and fabricate information on their private communication networks.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              I’m not sure what using a private instance or the government not owning said instance means to you here - it is a private instance, it is a privately owned instance, that doesn’t change anything about it being used by the president to make an official communication. If he used his personal phone to call a news org, it would still be him officially communicating. The medium doesn’t matter, the content and context does.

              No need to reiterate dictators can lie and fabricate information on their private communication networks.

              And… they do that on their publicly owned communication networks, too. Trump does that all the time. I’m not sure how this is at all relevant.

              side note:

              There wasn’t anything official about the abduction AFTER the Whitehouse declaration.

              I’m guessing that’s a typo? I’m not sure what you mean otherwise since there’s been absolutely shitloads of official discussion about the abduction of Maduro, the military action, etc. etc. including things like press conferences

              • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Because a president using a non official communication is not “an official US Government Communication.”

                The fact you keep calling him a president instead of a dictator abusing is use of “official US Government Communications” is far more revealing on how you view his actions of tax paid office hours.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  The fact you keep calling him a president instead of a dictator

                  You’re grasping at straws here dude, the reason I’m not calling him that is because he absolutely does not have supreme power. Not wanting to water down the term by calling any authoritarian bastard a “dictator” isn’t a sign of support, it’s a sign that I care about what words mean. By any strict definition of dictator he isn’t one - he’s a tyrannical, rapist, murdering pedophile bastard but he does not come close to meeting the most widely accepted definitions of what a dictator is.

                  (edit:)

                  Because a president using a non official communication is not “an official US Government Communication.”

                  Also, no, what? Do you mean using a non-official means of communication? Because that’s not a thing, we’ve been over that already. Otherwise this just doesn’t make sense and I have no idea what you’re trying to say.

    • sureshot0@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hey, I don’t know you as an individual, and I can’t say what I would do or not do in a Japanese internment situation… I don’t know anything about Japanese culture except anime, and I don’t like it, so I probably wouldn’t like modern life in Japan either I guess, but I have no idea. I also don’t know anything about Japanese-Americans, except that they wear different clothing styles than Japanese nationals, especially at the airport. Anyway. I’ll try in some way to prevent the government from murdering you, if you’re in America and I can do something about it. Whatever this is, shouldn’t be discussed here. I hope you’re ok.