I see a lot of Americans begging China to “save” the US. With great power comes great responsibility, yeah, but China’s responsibility is to its people. It’s a developing nation with a much higher standard for what developed means than the standard we use. Even if it were to ho out and save other countries, we’d probably have to get in line because there are many other countries that we fucked over (and are closer geographically) that could use China’s help (which they are providing via BRI). I don’t deny that the US is a priority target to bring down. It’s the engine behind climate change which may kill all of us. But I see those of us calling for help, and I try to understand…
It’s inconsiderate, yeah. After everything China’s been through. And I think it speaks to our programming. A lot of people in the US seem fine with doing nothing for they think it’ll be alright when they’re dead. I’m an atheist and I admit I’m guilty. Not having to worry or care or know about anything anymore appeals to me. But we also live in a different world from long ago, with far more distractions. I think George Jackson mentioned the advent of this phenomenon when TVs killed revolutionary motivation among prisoners. Whether that’s a good or bad development, it’s a development. It was inevitable and it changed everything. Personally, I think it might be good. That as the US weakens, it’ll be much weaker by the time we get to the new breaking point where people can’t distract themselves anymore. Provided we don’t all die first.
And that’s the thing. This is also the country that allowed a disabling virus to run rampant. I’ve been very disabled even before COVID. Many of us are disabled. And we’re spread far apart by the country’s car-based geography. And the enemy is the US. We’ve got odds stacked against us, at least for now. In that sense, I can understand people asking for help. Communism has interdependent elements. Telling the intentionally gimped proletariat of Nazi Germany to take back their country unassissted would be a slap in the face to them.
But I’m thinking, another hurdle to action on my part is that I find even my ML comrades socially reactionary. This is not a new phenomenon. ML’s have never been immune to being reactionary. The ones I knew contributed to several patriarchal phenomena that has ended up getting even some kids I knew killed among many others. It’s not that I don’t understand. The primary focus is the primary contradiction. When people have guaranteed housing and healthcare and don’t have to be hypervigilant about the US, that may give them more mental bandwidth to progress. We’ve seen it happen. But I admit, I’m really fighting the urge to join many of my comrades abroad and fantasize about the US and everyone in it getting wiped off the map. Even if, again, it’s a slap in the face to our struggling proletariat. So yeah, these are just my shower thoughts. And my curiosity about what will end up happening. Sorry.


This is just a…idk. My brain gets very emotional when i see logically contradictory things. It’s just that whenever i see “I hope every American gets glassed,” it’s like…I get it I guess. But I remember a little while ago someone wrote a memorial to the victims of the Dresden bombing, and the German government wiped it away. And when it got posted here it was a lot of people basically saying the bombing was unnecessary and that the German government was wrong for removing it.
So my brain looks at those two statements and it kinda just fries a little. And i don’t want to get angry or anything, and I always feel like I have to be in this little box of outward hatred towards people I know. Im…I’m not built like that. I can do self hatred, I’ve been doing self hatred for basically my entire life. But I can’t look at the people in my life and say they deserve the things I read in Last Train to Hiroshima.
For the China stuff, i always go back to what Franz Fanon said. “The Cold War must be ended, for it leads nowhere. The plans for nuclearizing the world must stop, and large-scale investments and technical aid must be given to underdeveloped regions. The fate of the world depends on the answer that is given to this question.”
It’s exactly that coupling and reliance that the US has on China that has allowed China to do its BRI. The peaceful development also what makes a lot of anti-imperialist countries comfortable with exchanges with China, when before Iran and other countries were wary to work with the USSR because of their heavy handedness [see: Assasinations in Afghanistan. I love Andropov but I feel like that was one of his biggest mistakes, besides dying].
But in any case, China has had a mixed history with internationalism as it was practiced during the age of the third international. Specifically with how many leaders of the CPC became somewhat…lazy in their thinking, simply attempting to copy And paste the soviet model of army, strategy, etc. [Although many good things came out of the cooperation as well] So I think it’s not only fair, but respectable of them to have learned lessons from that