• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      25 days ago

      I’m not sure that’s big enough of an advantage though. I hope it is but history shows that most people are more than willing to pay for convenience over freedom.

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Check out MilkV, they have a 64 core RISCV workstation that supports PCIe at full speeds and has NVMe and SATA slots like a completely normal x86 motherboard.

        People have gotten modern AAA games running on it.

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      25 days ago

      If you license a design from someone you’ll still be paying something. Sure there are also free implementations but they are aimed at microcontrollers, you won’t get any server class chips for free.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      I do not think it is about the royalties in most cases. I mean, RISC-V royalties may be the reason you choose it over ARM for a custom chips ( say in the bajillion SSDs you are going to ship ). Perhaps you were going to choose a different ISA for a microcontroller and the lack of license fee makes RISC-V attractive.

      For chip maker, it is the freedom that matters as that is what “convenience” means to them. And it means less risk. Look at the Qualcomm / ARM lawsuits right now. That would not happen if Qualcomm had chosen ARM.

      And if you are a chip maker licensing core designs, do you want your ISA to force you into a monopoly? ARM is more mature today but the role that ARM the company plays is being filled by multiple RISC-V suppliers ( HiFive, Milk-V, etc ). More players means more completion means more choice and probably better prices. ARM’s core business is licensing chip designs and they are about to have a lot of competition from RISC-C.

      And in the end, competition from and within the RISC-V space will drive down prices for consumers. That is what consumers are going to care about. The lower prices will not really be because of lower license fees ( though that will help of course ). And it all comes with a large and open software ecosystem. So the “convenience” will be there too.