• FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Counting on a tool that isn’t going to work is a major downside. Especially in the life and death situations that cause you to need one.

        • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Except now you have spent money on something that doesn’t work. It’s not “no different”, it’s a waste of resources.

            • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Better than nothing but, according to the research, as useful as nothing. If you know in advance it will work on a particular car’s glass then that’s a different story. But if you give it as a gift or buy one without knowing and it turns out to be useless it grants a false sense of security. Someone may repeatedly try using it in an emergency instead of trying a different strategy.

              • Arcka@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                according to the research

                You say that like it’s settled fact. Was the “research” peer-reviewed and published in a reputable journal? Has it been replicated?

                • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Did you read the article? It’s the entire reason this post exists. There are two citations that will answer your questions.

                  • Arcka@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Yes I read the blog post and the linked “research”. There is no indication that it has been replicated or even academically reviewed.

                    The linked PDF is even missing sections 8 & 9 listed in its TOC.

                • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I don’t know yet. But now that we know alternatives to these tools are needed we can let some experts in the field figure that out. Because we now know that these are useless on laminated glass and, per the article, a third of the tools sampled didn’t even work on non-laminated glass.

                  The article also points out how useless the seatbelt cutter is. And after hanging upside-down in my truck last December I can attest from first hand experience that the cutter would have definitely done more harm than good in my particular case.

    • Ech@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      there’s literally zero downside to having them in your car. Literal worst case scenario is that they simply do nothing.

      That IS a major downside. Relying on something that won’t work in a life-or-death situation wastes precious time. Knowing they don’t work is important so better alternatives can be prepared and planned for.