Contrary to headlines suggesting the EU has “backed away” from Chat Control, the negotiating mandate endorsed today by EU ambassadors in a close split vote paves the way for a permanent infrastructure of mass surveillance.

While the Council removed the obligation for scanning, the agreed text creates a toxic legal framework that incentivizes US tech giants to scan private communications indiscriminately, introduces mandatory age checks for all internet users, and threatens to exclude teenagers from digital life.

The article is non-paywalled, freely readable on the link --^

Including it here because Chat Control goes against the spirit of Open-Source technologies (which are usually meant and built for control over one’s device, privacy, trust… and no black boxes analyzing the content of messages you’re sending to your partner).

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    I feel like the biggest issue is the lack of 3rd party app stores or the need to “sideload” as opposed to just fucking installing an application like any normal computer

    • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Whats the difference between sideloading and installing? I don’t get it tbh.

      On windows for example, it is the norm to go online to a website, download an exe and double click it - instead of going to the microsoft store. And both are ways to install software. Neither way is doing it sideways.

      But also

      I can easily see fork related infrastructure for end users making it really eash or automatic to keep up with that cycle.

      There could be a store that installs software from github (there already is) and additionally tells you “hey this app you have got forked and the fork has more development happening, do you want to switch to that one and migrate all your settings? y/n”

      • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think the term was originally coined for installing apps on jailbroken iphones, but every company with its own app store has since adopted it because it makes it sound shady.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        There shouldnt be a difference but there is. Most iPhones require sideloading to get non-Apple App store apps.

        The issue is for most people, if the government fucks around and gets Signal banned, Apple is their enforcer all the while harping about security and standards and other nonsense. Its horseshit because the lack of encrypted messengers like Signal makes people sitting ducks for surveillance and prosecution from a corrupt governement and Apple enforces their violent monopoly on deciding if the people using its products have safe access to quality, encrypted appz

        • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          if the government fucks around and gets Signal banned

          you can use threema or wire or something else will become available on the appstore

          • lascapi@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Good luck to find people to use this apps.

            You know, the network effect etc… 😔

            But wait, the same EU is asking for interoperability to fight the network effect !! Maybe there is a light !

          • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Why wouldnt they do the same to Threema and Matrix/Elements/etc

            The same stuff would likely apply to Threema, any chat app that publicly is known for e2ee and refuses to backdoor it will be fair game