• Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m not so concerned with the instruction set. The differences are generally overrated.

      I’m concerned about monopoly power. Out of three companies that can legally make modern x86-64 processors, AMD is the only one worth talking about anymore. Unless China wants to throw some major weight into restarting VIA’s x86 line, that’s not likely to change. China seems fine with ARM and RISC-V, and ignoring x86.

      The competition on the horizon is no longer AMD vs Intel. It’s AMD vs ARM vs RISC-V.

    • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not necessarily about ARM. Based on their statements, they’re looking for >75% performance increase at similar power levels and cost. That spec doesn’t exist today and going forward, ARM will probably have a better shot at meeting that spec than AMD (depending on continued development of FEX).

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      If Apple licensed their optimised variant of ARM to third parties, Steam would probably jump right on it, along with other hardware manufacturers. The performance Apple Silicon got over the x86 machines it replaced was game-changing, along with the improved battery life. And other ARM vendors, whilst behind Apple (who do have excellent CPU engineers), are catching up.