• frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Cheaper and easier for the FBI to use a shelter’s incinerator than to equip every field office with an incinerator that would rarely be used.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      You don’t need one in every field office; just one in each region that several nearby offices can transport narcotics to for destruction.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m guessing that adds too much complexity to the whole chain-of-evidence thing.

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          ‘it’s too much paperwork’ is a pretty weak excuse for exposing the public to narcotics residue. The ashes in those furnaces are often collected and returned to families.