Is this a Nut?

Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works · 2 years ago

Is this a Nut?

AVincentInSpace@pawb.social · 2 years ago

Java: “Sorry, but the developers of Peanut didn’t declare it to implement the Crackable interface, even though it has all the relevant methods, so if you want to treat it like a nut your choices are write a wrapper class or call those methods using Reflections”

Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works · 2 years ago

Swift’s extensions system has spoiled me, and I feel the pain of this whenever I have to write Java

loutr@sh.itjust.works · 2 years ago

You should take a look at kotlin, pretty similar to swift and fully interoperable with java.

Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world · 2 years ago

“What Java said.”

Okay, that one made me chuckle.

bruhduh@lemmy.world · 2 years ago

C can STRUCTurise classes tho

pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years ago

wheres scala?

humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 years ago

It’s incompatible with the version of this meme

ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works · 2 years ago

I am static_casting the nut_t*. Pray I don’t static_cast it any further.

corroded@lemmy.world · 2 years ago

reinterpret_cast<int*>(&a_nut)

I like to live dangerously.