NASA, with the tampons.

    • usernamefactory@lemmy.caEnglish
      2·
      7 months ago

      A purist would know that it’s not Star Trek if Kirk, Spock, and McCoy are not present. We don’t need French men with English accents or William T. Ripoff!

    • atomic@programming.devEnglish
      43·
      7 months ago

      wtf is a Star Trek “purist” and why should anyone care about your arbitrary opinion?

        • atomic@programming.devEnglish
          42·
          7 months ago

          I love that your response to what a “star trek purist” is is a defense of bs opinions on the internet

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            1·
            6 months ago

            It probably means different things for different people, because like every other fandom, it’s kinda arbitrary.

            I was kind of purist. I started with TOS, but TNG, DS9, and VOY were right then too. Didn’t care as much for Voyager, but it was ok. Skipped Enterprise completely. I have TAS but haven’t watched it. Actively disliked the Kelvin movies. I’ve missed all the new stuff because I don’t stream, except Lower Decks, which I find delightful. I’m gonna pick up Picard and SNW soon.

          • NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world
            22·
            7 months ago

            I guess you missed the part where he quoted the exact part of your comment that he was replying to. Or do you just want to ignore that part so you don’t have to defend it?