• ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well for one, I’m glad law enforcement are required to have body cams for accountability. Imagine if police unions lobbied so that the body cam requirement is be removed because of privacy reasons.

        • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          They are recording what the police do and say. It clearly doesn’t make a difference that the camera is technically pointing away from them. Do you think this person would have been ok with wearing a corporate bodycam because it isn’t pointing at her? No obviously not.

          The thing that is different is that police have control of it, and they generally only use it in public where there’s no expectation of privacy, and they’re the bloody police and have guns and kill people!

      • Arbiter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Except they have full control over those cameras and the footage they record.

        Anytime there’s misconduct they just refuse to release the footage or they turn off the camera.

          • Arbiter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Except even when they are filmed nothing happens, they just get paid leave or shuffled to another department.

            • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Before video evidence became a thing, almost 0% of police brutality would face any consequences. With video, its now non-zero, should be ideally at 100%, but getting the statistic away from 0% is a great start. The murderer or George Floyd would’ve walked away without video evidence. When there’s more cameras, the odds of punishment is better than without cameras.

              • Arbiter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                That’s a fair point, I’m just skeptical how much of a difference a new tech gadget can make on systemic issues.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              At least then the victim’s family can get a wrongful death payout. It would be even better if they abolished qualified immunity.