

“a hair out of place” in this case is the same underlying goals wrapped in progressive rhetoric…


“a hair out of place” in this case is the same underlying goals wrapped in progressive rhetoric…
What other uses did you state that traditional bone conducting headphones can’t do? Or any of the many audio only fashion glasses?
You paid a premium to one of the worst corporations to have a feature you claim not to want?


The film’s title comes from an Israeli military acronym used euphemistically to refer to civilians expected to be killed in a military attack.
It means collateral damage. It’s what the Nazi IDF openly refers to civilians as.


You are simping. What about wasting your taxes to commit war crimes to make the rich richer and keep them in power is serving the public?


Liberals are just as bad as conservatives. It’s a team sport to them, and if you dare point out a flaw about their team they get defensive and accuse you of being on the other team.


If you watched the interview y’all are mocking just to defend a Biden, he talks about his presidential ambitions.


How do you think Americans will react if USA drops a Nuke on Iran?
They’re okay with dropping the equivalent of dropping over 6 nukes on a concentration camp with over 50% child population, why wouldn’t they be okay with dropping a few on what they’ve been raised to believe is the big bad wolf?


You missed the point. It’s not a competition for who’s worse, it’s whose side are they on.
Reagan wouldn’t have been able to do half the damage he did if Carter didn’t setup the mechanisms for him. Carter’s damage wasn’t immediate, but Reagan built on it.
If it weren’t for Carter, we’d still have strong regulations and labor protection, or at least we might be able to blame someone else for doing it. Carter did it, he took foundation blocks from the very bottom of society and gave Reagan a sledge hammer, but yes Reagan is the one that brought the wall down.
All US presidents bad, sure. Carter is portraid as an exception, as a leftist, as a humanitarian, it’s all sanctification and proganada, he royally fucked American citizens for the benefit of corporations, and every single mess we’re dealing with today can be directly traced back to those actions.
deleted by creator


I don’t know about this `racists who fought a war over owning slaves “had a sense of shame” and “didn’t want to be remembered for their part in the most destructive and pointless war” take.
When they eventually did build statues, they imported them from the north. They didn’t build them in their lifetime because it wasn’t a popular thing to do, and as such they literally didn’t have the skills or foundries to make them. Not to mention they were actually fighting a war, not sitting in their bunkers ordering air strikes.


You only accept money in return for goods? You don’t labor?
Weird flex, or you’re just not thinking this through, even though I spelt out a few different scenarios.
Put yourself in the shoes of an average person. You go to a gas station and pay cash, your change is $1.23 and they give you a Trump coin and tell you that’s all in the register, what do you? You let the company keep your change? You take it and drive to a bank to exchange it?
You buy a water from a vending machine on a hot day, you put in a $5 bill and the machine gives you a couple Trump coins back, you throw them away? You give them back to the machine?
You may be able to avoid it, I don’t ever use USD cash, I’ll be able to avoid it, but the general public will be using it. If it proves unpopular like the 150 year anniversary coin that similarly carried a portrait of the sitting president, it’ll be removed from circulation and actually become a collectable that some moron will pay thousands for. If not, it’ll be used like any other coin.
It’s already in circulation, arguing with facts because you don’t like them is dumb, just as dumb as someone suggesting they’ll destroy their own money “on principal”. This is burning your own shoes or destroying your own beer level stupid, since you like referencing dumb conservatives.
Do you expect the already wealthy to represent you? To not take bribes and enact laws that benefit them?
$300/month 😂😭😢😐


What does that have to do with accepting money?


EVERY country has some sort of equivalent.
Oufff. Nope. Don’t say things so confidently.
There are tens of countries that don’t have any income tax, tens of other countries have a flat tax, and if the remaining counties that have more complex tax systems the vast majority don’t require annual filing.
Your system is not complicated for your benefits, it’s made to benefit the rich.


you may be able to personally avoid it, but it’s going into circulation and the general public will use it


They’re there, they just don’t get the same attention as stupid stunts like a new coin or renaming places.


And if that’s all they have, you’ll still refuse it? If a machine gives it to you, you’ll throw it away? You’ll go to a bank and wait in line to exchange it with a bill?
I get where you’re coming from, it’s disgusting, you may be able to personally avoid it, but it’s going into circulation and the general public will use it, and simply refusing it isn’t an option or a stupid costly one for a lot of people.


You’re rich enough to refuse money? Good for you.
It’ll be in circulation, in vending machines, in cashier’s registers, everywhere soon enough. And when all the morons that paid over $1 for it realize it’s not a collectible item, their life savings will enter circulation as well.
They had a baby, and American health insurance killed him.