• theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s an Emotional Support Truck, which is hilarious based on how opposed they are to gender affirming care.

  • Svamp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 days ago

    What is even the point of these, from what i seen the truck bed does not seem that much bigger if at all then a normal pickup truck?

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Big diesel crew cab rigs are for towing trailers while hauling a crew. Think land scaping, construction etc.not too useful for the average joe using it as a Honda civic but for the right business they are exactly what you need.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Even then, most companies would be better off running 2 trucks and sets of equipment rather than 1 big truck hauling everyone and everything. It would cost a bit more than one big truck but significantly improve operational flexibility.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          It would be more than a “bit” more. There would be the purchase price of 2 trucks, license fees for plates, commercial insurance for 2 trucks, 2 trailers, and maintenance for 2 trucks and trailers. And it would be silly for just one crew of 3 or 4 people, which most small contractors are. So unless you have a real need to own multiples and have multiple crews all working at the same time, doubling your equipment always costs more.

          But for 2-man crews, there is no reason for a crew cab, and you don’t see them as a rule.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yes, but a genuine light, single cab truck is significantly cheaper than the crew cab super duty, especially once you account for fuel economy and maintenance. Its like spending more up front for a more effecient appliance. You end up saving in the long run despite more cost up front.

            You also have better operational flexibility. One truck could take off with 2 crew members to another jobsite once the bulk of the work or certain equipment is finished at the first job site. You could also position the trucks and equipment at different locations on a large multi acre property.

            Under most circumstances, 2 light trucks makes more sense than 1 super duty.

        • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s more likely that a company will get a van or cube/box truck (think U-haul), that has all the equipment and stuff, and the rest of the workers just take their own transportation to the job site. Virtually any time I’ve seen a company-owned pickup that wasn’t kitted out for a task, it was for the boss.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Thats common if its something they don’t do often or are using equipment they rented. Landscapers, independent home builders, and other certain trades often have their own equipment and trucks/trailers to haul it.

      • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’d personally hate to use one of these for any of those jobs, I’d need a ladder to get the fucking ladder out of the bed. Ignore me, I’m just getting old and confused as to why the truck keeps getting bigger, but the bed keeps getting smaller. Even a shitbox from 1995 has a full 8 foot bed but for some damn reason, now they are almost impossible to find.

        • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          I like that GM brought back the Avalanche’s midgate for their electric Silverado, but I wish that was available on more trucks. Default configuration is a short-bed family hauler, but you drop the midgate and it becomes a 2-seater with an 8’ bed.

        • innermachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Best truck I ever worked out of was a long box regular cab s10 lol. Drop the tail gate down and u only have to lift crap somewhere between your knees and hips to load it, these big short bed trucks I have to hoist stuff up about chest high to load it then I’m out of room in no time because the beds like 4 feet long LOL. Usually those big trucks are for towing stuff and putting a couple pack outs in the trunk (bed would be too generous). Quite frankly if u don’t need a goose neck a 2500 van is probably the ticket, can tow about the same as a 2500 truck but u have a useful covered cargo area that’s easy to load and more secure.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The bed is like the truck balls, it’s only there for manly affirmation, but really serves no practical purpose.

      • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        In the south, trucks like that are practically a status symbol. Lift kit, knotted tires (bald within a year because they only drive it on paved roads), expensive ass brush guard with a winch that’s never been used, spray in bedliner with big diamond plate bed box, pristine multi-trailer hitch, Yeti/Browning/fjb/FAFO/tbl/wE tHe PeOpLe decal on the window along with whatever big football college they never went to…

        The most they’ve ever hauled in it is groceries, and the dirtiest it ever gets is when it rains. If any mud get on it for any reason they leave it on for as long as possible

      • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I agree in 90 percent of cases but I have one with a fucked up bed and it’s only six months old. I use it every other day to do deliveries.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s a 5 seat sedan with a bed they don’t use. the point is they want to look mean

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The beds of pickup trucks are largely vestigial, they’re designed as crew plus trailer haulers. A truck like that will be advertised pulling a yacht on a trailer over the Rockies. It’s got enough bed to put a gooseneck hitch in. A van or SUV will keep up with a pickup with a Class IV hitch, but a pickup truck is a miniature tractor trailer now.

      Using the bed as a bulk cargo box is actually pretty rare these days.

    • Drunk & Root@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      normally youd get more torque because its a bigger engine but this dudes truck in the city so theres actually no point but the point is so you can pull stuff out of mud or tow your tractor or somthin on your farm

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I blame the truck manufacturers more than the poor, deluded shlubs who buy them. There used to be standards in the industry but “big” costs more so they make more money (initially…while pricing a whole class of citizens out of the market).

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 days ago

        Regulation (in a way) is exactly how we got into this situation. CAFE was meant to enforce emissions standards, but the way it was written meant that making a bigger vehicle resulted in a lower fuel economy requirement. The Chicken Tax essentially stopped foreign trucks from being able to compete in the US market, which meant that Ford/GM/Dodge got to create an oligopoly.

        • grepe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          regulation only works if the laws are not written by the companies that are being regulated

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            They fought it. I’m sure they’d prefer if there were no environmental or gas efficiency regulations at all. And when the laws passed anyway they found loopholes. The laws were written by well meaning but naive politicians, none of whom really understood the problems they were trying to address.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      A truck is only slightly more expensive to produce than a sedan when all costs are taken into account, but can be sold at a higher price.

      The main difference between a truck and a sedan is a few hundred pounds of metal. Both have the same cost in labour to manufacture, as well as equivalent R&D cost. In some cases, trucks have lower R&D because they aren’t expected to change as much from year to year, so the engineering cost of re-designing parts/panels/etc. just isn’t there.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      The manufacturers definitely have a large share of the blame, but people still have the agency to make better choices.

    • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      I am right there with you. I’m not super big on blaming individuals for stuff like this. I saw an old Tacoma parked next to one of these monsters the other day and I was like, holy smokes, the size is just out of control.

      • oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        They would stop making it if people didn’t buy it.

        Every single person that has one of these should be shamed to hell and back for it.

        I don’t know of a single justification, either. At all.

        Forget cat narc, we need truck narc who just chips the fronts of all these monsters off.

      • Final Remix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        There’s someone with a new Tacoma on my campus and even that fucking thing has a front hood higher than my sedan’s roof.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      In 2012 the federal fuel economy standards were changed to no longer consider the classification of vehicle, but just its footprint. So suddenly a Corolla had less-strict fuel economy requirements than a small truck.

      So the Ranger, Dakota, S-10, etc were all discontinued, and manufacturers learned that the easiest way to meet fuel economy standards was to make the vehicles bigger every time the requirements increase.

      It’s also why around 2022, every small cargo van (NV200, Transit Express, ProMaster City) stopped being produced. It’s also why the Maverick has the “standard” model as the hybrid while the one you can actually find at the dealers is the “upgrade” traditional engine.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Correct. I meant the Colorado, which they took off the market for the 2013 and 2014 models to redesign as a larger truck. Ford did the same thing.

          That was a particularly dumb error on my part, BTW. I owned a 2001 S10 and 2012 Colorado. Now I own a 2020 NV200.

          If I buy a car, it apparently gets discontinued soon afterwards.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I still have my 2003 S10. I got one of the last few thousand extended cab S10s made. I haven’t ever driven a Colorado, but…I don’t think there’s a pickup that will do the job of an S10 better than my truck, they’ve all mutated into 6 ton penis enhancement sedans wearing ceremonial miniature cargo boxes.

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I loved my S10. It was the best vehicle I ever had.

              I bought it in 2005 for $3,000 with 42k miles on it because the previous owner’s dad was a drunk and kept rubbing the side of it pulling in and out of the driveway. I didn’t care that the paint looked bad, and I drove that truck for 11 years. I sopd it when the engine gave up the ghost, but kinda wished I’d just paid for the repair instead of buying the Colorado, which I was never really pleased with.

              I’ve loved the NV200 though. I teach scuba as a side gig and it makes a great dive gear hauler.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      I blame both considering how often I see people brag about how big their trucks are. Motherfucker you’ve got a short bed and extended cabin, and you’re out here talking about an engine like you need to be able to go 90 while hauling an oversized trailer.

      Sure you can’t buy a small truck anymore, and it’s getting harder to buy compact cars, subcompacts, and even full sized sedans, but it’s not like all trucks sold today are that big.

      • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        “wHy MuH gAs So ExPeNsIvE?”

        Dawg, you’re driving around a tank, that’s why. And you’re not impressing anyone else except other chuds.

    • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well not only “big = more expensive” the larger engines also have lower efficiency requirements. It’s much easier to make cars bigger and more “chugging” because they don’t have to meet the efficiency standards and because it’s bigger they can charge more.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s another symptom of the infinite growth mindset that is not only plaguing boardrooms but average citizens.

    • Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Trucks are driven by trades people.

      They have the luxury of passing the cost of things like gas on to the customer by simply raising their price.

        • Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s a just normal f250

          Doesn’t even have fancy rims or tires

          If you have to haul any trailer or equipment yes you drive one of these or similar

            • Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Maybe if you’re a painter and all you need is a ladder or two

              Any framer needs a trailer full of tools… or you need to haul a bobcat in a dump trailer… or any of the exterior trades that need scaffolding an planks and multiple ladders etc, plus hauling materials

              • Lumelore (She/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                If you need to haul extremely heavy stuff than you should be using that truck for work and only work. There’s no good reason to be driving a massive truck like that around to do stuff everyone else does with a normal car. Unless you’re in a rural area, no one driving a normal car wants be around your hog, especially in the cities where space is much tighter. And clearly OPs image is an urban area cause there wouldn’t be a parking ramp otherwise.

                • Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  There is no law against driving a normal truck like that to the mall or anywhere for that matter

                  Everyone needs groceries and new socks from the mall

  • Heikki2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    I recall at previous job I worked, an old guy bought a giant truck, I think it was a GMC 6500. I’m between 6’1" to 6’3", depending on which gas station I’m leaving. I could easily walk under the side mirrors.

    He worked second shift. I’d see it in the lot when i was leaving and it’d be gone when I arrived in the morning. I noticed in the morning, the truck was sitting in 1 spot for about 2 weeks before I asked around.Apparently the hurt himself while leaving one late night. He was climbing in and fell out backwards. I think it sat in one spot for another 6 weeks before someone finally came and got. It was an obnoxiously large truck

  • texture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    what im even more sick of is smaller (normal) sized trucks that people just decide to park across two spots anyway. like who the hell do they think they are

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    It really is interesting how we have such large trucks and very few parking spots outside of the back nine of Wal-marts parking lot even close to big enough for them.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think people who drive somethimg like that really do not care at all. They juat use three spots ot the disabled spot.

      • pulsey@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        You could argue that those kind of people are at least mentally challenged.

  • kevinsky@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    You could park a Smart Fortwo in front of that honda and it would still not protrude as far out as this truck is.

  • ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    When I lived in the northeast, pre-2002, I remember seeing a few Escalade SUVs.

    When I moved to the PNW, I suddenly discovered that there is also such a thing as an Escalade PICKUP. Extended cab, natch.