• ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    ·
    3 days ago

    In a brief order, the conservative majority argued, among other things, that the District Court had intervened to block the maps too close to next year’s midterm election.

    Eleven months away is too close to the next election for these clowns.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      88
      ·
      3 days ago

      The decision has nothing to do with their stated reasons; they are in favor of racism, but don’t want to say so

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        3 days ago

        Same bullshit that Mitch McConnell claimed why Obama couldn’t appoint a Supreme Court justice fuck this illegmeaite Supreme Court.

        • TacoSocks@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          And then did a speed run to install a Supreme Court Justice like 45 days before an election under Trump.

    • HocEnimVeni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 days ago

      Dont forget 9 months is too close to an election to approve a supreme court justice nomination, unless the president is Republican and then less than a month is plenty of time

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Election was already underway. There were already absentee balls cast ousting him from office when they approved his nomination

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      Fuck that shit. They use this argument whenever it suits them. And what suits this fascist admin, suits the SCOTUS.

      Didn’t Trump himself appoint SCOTUS judges “too close” to the election? Clowns.

      • Thebular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Barrett, for starters. Nominated 38 days prior to the 2020 election, and confirmed just 8 days prior.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      But wouldn’t the opposite be true? Changing the maps too close to the election is a problem. “Keeping them the same too close to the election” makes no sense.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      Texas passed their new maps on August 29th. On November 18 the district court ordered them to revert to their previous maps.

      Apparently the SC’s Republican cult members think this will be too difficult for Texas?

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Fellow being, this particular mask has been off ever since Donny the Destroyer appointed his cronies to be SCOTUS judges - “too close” to the election, btw.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      No no, dont even give it that much dignity. The complainants are not asking to “block the map” too close (11 months) to elections. They are asking that the map not be illicit, unethically changed 5 years early, based off the explicit public request of the President who is not meant to have power over state election matters, with the explicitly stated intent of gerrymandering out more seats for Republicans that they “deserve” than they otherwise would have won, only 15ish months to the elections (which is apparently plenty of time). Their “reasoning” doesn’t make sense because it’s not reasoning. It’s blatant full chested support of voter suppression/disenfranchisement to bolster their party and their autocratic President. They’re so full of shit you could smell them talking from the next room over. Fuck those lying, cheating, corrupt, un-American, fascist cunts.

    • DokPsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      Does it even fucking matter at this point? There will be zero repercussions for the blatant disregard for the law to serve the authoritarian regime so they can say whatever they want

    • BertramDitore@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, for real. Let’s hope the Majestic Imperious High Court deigns to grace us with any explanation. They love their emergency docket…

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      If that happens, nations around the globe should really wake up to the threat coming from the USA.

      …oh, who am I kidding…

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here’s the fun part. They’ll use the shadow docket and won’t give any rationale.

  • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The Supreme Kangaroo Court of the United States strikes again. It’s kind of amazing that out of 9 justices we have 2 avowed rapists, not to mention several christian nationalists.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I 100% blame the Democratic party for this. They’ve been assisting the Republicans in their efforts to create this court for the last 40 years. Thomas should never have been confirmed to the court and Ruth Bader Ginsberg hung on at a time when she should have left while the “liberal” dems controlled both the presidency and the Senate and could easily have replaced her with a(n at least mostly) liberal justice.

      • frunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I would still place some blame on Republicans for insisting on nominating sexual offenders, corrupt pieces of shit, etc. Yes the Dems should have done more to stop them, but i think the GOP should bear some responsibility for being sociopaths

        • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Republicans are human, but they’re not people in the normative sense of the word. Blaming them is like blaming rabid animals. You might think this is an exaggeration. Technically, only 5% of people are psychopathic, but the condition is a spectrum. Sub-diagnostically, it’s closer to 30% of the population. Those are the folks happy to ban abortion, criminalize homosexuality, etc. A main feature of psychopathy is an indifference to the truth, moral or empirical, and the suffering of others.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Blaming Republicans is like blaming a wolf for eating a chicken. It’s in their nature, it’s what they do. So no, I’m going to blame the farmer for allowing the wolf into the chicken coop in the first place.

          • TheGoldenV@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Don’t blame the murderer, it’s just in their nature. Hmmm…. Pretty shit take TBH. Dems are chickenshit fail lovers, but let’s be real. The reason the SC is loaded with these scumbags is due to Republicans, Bitch McTurtle, and the Fed Soc.

      • immutable@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s also frustrating that they let a seat be stolen.

        McConnell invents a rule out of whole cloth and blocks an appointment.

        The Dems could have played hard ball, they could have gone with the line that the senate was fulfilling its role of advising and consenting by not holding a vote. They want it to be read as a rejection, make them hold a vote, say that no vote means they are fine with it.

        Republicans exceed their powers every time they have them to reshape this country to their vision. Democrats refuse to use the full scope of their power to accomplish anything.

        Repeat ad nauseam.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I obviously disagree with this ruling, but if they were to rule the opposite on California, the absolute sheer corruptness would be undeniable. And worthily of drastic and dramatic action on our (the citizens) part.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Okay but then it’ll be double plus undeniable. People will definitely do something in response. You’ll see.

      • bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Citizens wouldn’t even vote in their own interest, and now it’s too late. I’m convinced tens of millions of Americans will die quietly before even one stands up.

      • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Their sheer corruptness is already undeniable. The six right wing hacks regularly make decisions that are blatantly and obviously unconstitutional and write nonsense opinions to justify them. They openly accept huge bribes from those impacted by their decisions and then rule in their favor. If the GOP gave a damn about the rule of law and the Constitution they would have been impeached long ago.

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    We should start calling it Robertsmander rather than Gerrymander from now on. If having no shame while he’s living has no effect, then the best he deserves is his name being tarnished and synonymous with corruption for hundreds of years.

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Fascinating stuff! It’s like russia with extra steps and a gigantic amount of comical ostentatious posturing about freedoms and liberty.

    Americans do love their theatrics!

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Political maneuver literally named after a US politician

      “Wow, this is just like Foreignistan!”

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Agreed! It’s MUCH too Close to an Election to Make Changes!

    -The Supreme Court Justice who was appointed AFTER people ALREADY Voted!

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it’s too close to the election they need to approve a bill through legislature that changes need to happen before a specific number of days before an election, otherwise they are just legislating from the bench pretending it’s legal. Which is obviously the case here because they can’t argue justifications for their racist bullshit in an open forum.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Redistricting unrelated to a change in the number of seats should be banned.

      But if we are going to allow them, they should not be allowed to take effect until the following election cycle. This would give the court time to review the maps as well as allow the voters to have input prior to the change.